Review of Zadie Smiths Stuart - 780 Words

Whether one is from Europe or Asia, human nature, personal ethics, and the individual conscience are all aspects that build up a person’s character and personality. These are the aspects that lead us to make decisions, to reason, and most importantly to make judgements. Zadie Smith’s writing involves various cultures and generations and these different perspectives resonate with human thoughts and feelings. In her short story, â€Å"Stuart†, Zadie Smith uses comparisons and various other literary techniques to portray the significance of creating judgements from only one’s perceptions; as well as, the importance and impact of change on individuals. â€Å"He lies like an eyewitness† (5). An eyewitness’s story is usually one that develops solely from†¦show more content†¦Words such as: â€Å"womanish† (5), â€Å"wisps† (5), and â€Å"spindly† (5) give a sense of an immature, childish, and awkward demeanour. Another aspect of her writing style that is appealing is the way she relates these boys to nature and defines them in biological terms, â€Å"...extremities of flamingos...†(5), â€Å"...might be prehensile...†(5), â€Å"...evolutionary development...†(6). This descriptive format—using natural instead of cultural references--serves greatly to universalize her descriptions and examples; and by doing so she allows the narrator and various characters to take any form the reader can associate with. Through this way not only does the reader learn about the teenage boys, but also about the narrator and how the narrator, like most men and women, is quick to obser ve and make assumptions. She is able to show how humans define each other by their actions, appearances and how this leads to judgements. These judgments, if negative, have the ability to develop into racial and class tensions. In this passage, Zadie Smith refers to the concept of metamorphosis in both its physical and psychological forms. The boys are experiencing great changes in their physical bodies with transformations of their hair, limbs, hands, and feet. However, these boys are also changing their behaviour, â€Å"...they are always in a pack and on the move...† (6). This passage describes these boys in the middle of a transitional phase by describing these boys through contradictory phrases:

The Pros and Cons of Human Cloning Essay - 3781 Words

The cloning of humans is now very close to reality, thanks to the historic scientific breakthrough of Dr. Ian Wilmut and his colleagues in the UK. This possibility is one of incredible potential benefit for all of us. Unfortunately the initial debate on this issue has been dominated by misleading, sensationalized accounts in the news media and negative emotional reactions derived from inaccurate science fiction. Much of the negativity about human cloning is based simply on the breathtaking novelty of the concept rather than on any real undesirable consequences. On balance, human cloning would have overwhelming advantages if regulated in a reasonable way. A comprehensive ban on human cloning by a misinformed public would be a sorry†¦show more content†¦Cloning will be done only at the request and with the participation of ordinary people, as an additional reproduction option. Many people have asked, Why would anyone want to clone a human being? There are at least two good rea sons: to allow families to conceive twins of exceptional individuals, and to allow childless couples to reproduce. In a free society we must also ask, Are the negative consequences sufficiently compelling that we must prohibit consenting adults from doing this? We will see that in general they are not. Where specific abuses are anticipated, these can be avoided by targeted laws and regulations, which I will suggest below. Alleged Objections to Human Cloning Some politicians in the United States are now proposing to save us from the horrors of human cloning by a comprehensive prohibition. The interesting thing is that under close analysis there really arent any serious problems. In the few cases where abuses are likely to occur, these can be avoided by targeted legislation. There is nothing about human cloning per se that justifies its criminalization. The only objection that stands up under analysis is that the technology has not been perfected. This is a justification for further research, not for a prohibition. The only objection that stands up under analysis is that the technology has not been perfected. This is a justification forShow MoreRelatedThe Pros And Cons Of Human Cloning1532 Words   |  7 PagesReplicating a human is a topic that a handful of individuals feel very strongly for. Copying a human’s DNA can potentially be a means of reproducing for a couple that may not be able to have children. On the other hand, copying a human’s DNA can take away the individuality of a person. Although I am always taking into account other individual’s perspectives, human cloning is something that I feel is unjust. Human cloning is fallacious and immoral due to lack of positive results and lack of libertyRead MoreThe List Of Pros And Cons Of Human Cloning1624 Words   |  7 PagesThe list of Pros and cons of human cloning Summary: The necessary technology has been created, as evident in the story of Dolly the sheep. People still pose questions such as the role of God in Society. Here is a list of pros of human cloning : It could eliminate defective genes , It is considered as the logical next step in the reproductive technology, It could aid in faster recoveries from injuries, it gives a new meaning to genetic modification. As all things human cloning also has cons. Here isRead MorePros and Cons of Cloning Humans906 Words   |  4 Pagespossibility of cloning a human. Although the scientists from the Roslin Institute who had made the significant breakthrough with Dolly denied the possibility of creating human clones, the idea was still wide debated about the risks and benefits of human cloning. So, what is cloning? Cloning is a process of generating a new organism by an identical genetic copy of the original donor. The DNA of the two organisms will be identical (LaurenÈ›iu, 2012).With the developm ent stage of science, human has been alreadyRead MoreThe Pros and Cons of Human Cloning Essay601 Words   |  3 Pageswould be no diversity what so ever in todays society. Ban human cloning!, Jean Bethke Elshtain author of To Clone or Not to Clone, displays a strong argument as to why human cloning should be banned. Cloning may bring advances in artificial organs, cosmetics, and age reduction; but nevertheless it takes away a humans individuality, uniqueness, and basically that persons right to live his own life. Scientists have high hopes about cloning and what it might bring. They are talking about settingRead MorePros and Cons of Human Cloning Essay2024 Words   |  9 Pages Cloning is a process in which genetically identical copies of biological matter are created through nonsexual means. Clones are made up of organisms that are exact genetic copies. Every piece of their DNA is identical. Cells, genes, tissues and entire organisms can be created through cloning. Aside from cloning being done in a lab, clones do happen naturally. Identical twins are just one natural example of cloning. Cloning has been used for many years. The earliest examples of cloning haveRead MoreAmazed by Cloning1544 Words   |  6 PagesCloning is an amazing complex thing! In this paper a person will learn some basic cloning information, the history of cloning, good and bad things about cloning, human cloning, and bringing back endangered species with the use of cloning. Information includes the processes and some animals that have been cloned. The history includes the different cloning achievements starting with the first artificial twin. The good and bad parts will of course talk about the pros and cons of cloning. HumanRead MoreThe Consequences Of Cloning In Frankenstein By Mary Shelley1470 Words   |  6 PagesThe invention of cloning, both a blessing and a curse, can possibly enable humanity to reach eternal life. An invention is the creation of a device developed after a study or an experiment, in the hopes of benefiting society. The novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley is about an inventor, Victor Frankenstein, who creates life that he later rejects. His invention results in consequences for both himself and his creation. Both cloning and the creation of the monster was made to benefit and advance society’sRead MoreCloning Pros And Cons Of Cloning1147 Words   |  5 Pages Cloning Pros Cons Nicole Hedrick Baker College HSC 402A /Dr. Eric Oestmann/Seminar Two Position/Argument Essayâ€Æ' Abstract A clone is where two organisms share the same exact DNA. These two organisms are the same identical replica of each other. In the past, cloning has taken place naturally. For instance, a couple who naturally conceived and gave birth to identical twins or triplets. Today, science and technology has been introduced to where cloning can intentionally be done. Some peopleRead MoreShould Pets Be Cloned?1477 Words   |  6 PagesCBMS880- Medical and Molecular Biotechnology | Animal cloning is getting popular by scientists day by day after the success of the sheep Dolly which was the first animal clone in the world. Dolly was created effectively by Roslin Instute scientist in Edinburgh (TechNyou) and she was euthanized when she was six year old due to a virus-induced lung tumour (Mott M., 2004). Even though the relevant scientists report that there is no evidence that cloning might be the cause of the disease of Dolly (Mott MRead More Cloning: Is It Ethical? Essay1574 Words   |  7 PagesCloning: Is It Ethical? Science today is developing at warp speed. We have the capability to do many things, which include the cloning of actual humans! First you may ask what a clone is? A clone is a group of cells or organisms, which are genetically identical, and have all been produced from the same original cell. There are three main types of cloning, two of which aim to produce live cloned offspring and one, which simply aims to produce stem cells and then human organs. These three are:

Creation vs Evolution free essay sample

Almost everyone wonders if the universe was created and how it was created. People also ask, â€Å"How did human originate? † This is an argument that has been fought for many years. Although there are several ideas, society mainly argues over two of them. The first idea is that man was created by God during his creation of the universe. This is the idea of creationism. It is supported by many religious people. Creationism is supported by religion. The second way that humans could have originated is through a process called evolution. Evolution is a theory proposed by scientists to explain the origin of all species. Because both explanations are theories, neither can be proven right or wrong. To make a decision on which theory is correct, people must choose either religion or science. The first theory about the origin of man is called creationism. Creationism is taking the literal meaning of the Bible. This theory is supported throughout the world by many religions. Creationism is the theory that God created the universe and its inhabitants in six days. Because creation occurred long ago, the length of a day is undefined. In the language of Hebrew, a day could have been twelve hours, twenty-four hours, or an epoch. If the length was an epoch, creation could stretch back over billions of years (Stencil 759). The information to support creationism comes from the Bible. The Bible is not considered a science book, but many consider it to be scientifically correct. Currently, there is no scientific evidence that proves the Bible to be incorrect. Genesis, the first book of the Bible, contains the information about creation. Genesis 1 describes the physical events of creation. Genesis 2 describes the creation of human and other details. The creation process can be broken down into steps. First, God created the physical universe; this included space, tie, matter, energy, galaxies, starts planets, etc. The earth’s atmosphere transformed from opaque to translucent. The water cycle was then created. God then established the continents and oceans and put plant life on the continents. Next, the Brewer 2 earth’s atmosphere transformed from translucent to transparent; the sun, moon, and stars become visible. God then created small sea animals and later sea mammals. Next, He created birds. Afterward, He created land mammals; these were both wild and domesticated. The creation of mankind was the final step. The first two humans God put on the earth were Adam and Eve. In creationism, all humans are direct descendants from Adam and Eve. Creationism has yet to be proven wrong by scientific evidence (â€Å"Creation versus Evolution†). A creationist is someone who supports creationism. They believe in a God who is the absolute creator of both heaven and earth. They were created out of nothing and by an act of free will. They believe that God is constantly involved in his creation. He is also ready to intervene at any time that he feels is necessary. Creationists include Christians, Muslims and Jews. Because creationism means the direct taking of the Bible, creationists take the Bible as a true guide to the history of life. Creationists believe that God put Adam on the earth first. He then created Eve. They also believe that there was a world-wide flood after the initial creation. Some creationists believe the universe was created less than 10,000 years ago (Stencil 759). Creationists feel that evolution goes against the Bible. They also feel that supporting the theory of evolution is sacrilegious (â€Å"Creationism†). It is impossible to prove that God does not exist. Creationists believe that God can only be known as He wills to be known. As part of their religion, creationists support the theory of creationism (Morris). The second theory about the origin of man is known as evolution. Evolution refers to the cumulative changes that occur in a population over time. The changes are produced at a less drastic level. An organism’s genes may mutate and/or recombine in different ways during reproduction. When this organism is born, have minor to major advantages or disadvantages. The Brewer 3 rganisms born with the advantages will have a better opportunity to survive and reproduce. During reproduction, the advantages may be inherited by the offspring. When this process occurs to many individuals within a species, the organisms with the advantages will have a higher frequency. This will be higher than that of the organisms without the advantages. Eventually the organisms will become an evolved po pulation. The other population may survive or become extinct (â€Å"Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial† 7). The first scientist to introduce the theory of evolution was the Greek Anaximander in 520 BC. When the idea was proposed, it was not called evolution. Anaximander suggested that life began as slime and moved to drier places to develop. Until the nineteenth century, people thought only thought that each species was miraculously created out of nothing. Today, this idea is known as evolution. The main researcher of evolution was Charles Darwin. He was not well respected among others. He proposed his theory of evolution in the nineteenth century. He proposed that in each generation, a species contains individuals with characteristics varying slightly from average. These differences may be minor, but some give those individuals a better chance of surviving and reproducing. This will pass on the advantages to the offspring. That species may become extinct. Nevertheless, its offspring, the new species, are better at surviving the environment. Darwin came up with this theory after his many trips the Galapagos Islands, which are located in South America. Darwin’s theories were not accepted until later in the twentieth century (â€Å"What Darin Never Knew†). The theory of evolution is supported by science. Since Charles Darwin proposed his theory there is a large amount of evidence that has been discovered. DNA provides powerful evidence that humans evolved from human-like ancestors. Humans share 98 percent of their DNA with chimpanzees. This shows how closely humans and chimpanzees are related. The Brewer 4 differences in DNA distinguish the different species (â€Å"Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial† 12). Because humans and chimpanzees are so closely related, scientists have concluded that they share common ancestors. This means that both chimpanzees and humans evolved from an ape-like ancestor. The first ape-like animals walked on earth about six million years ago. Scientists are now discovering that there could have been several human-like species living at one time. Many wonder why the others have become extinct, and why humans, Homo sapiens, are the only ones that are still living (â€Å"Becoming Human†). Those who are not very well informed on the theory of evolution believe that man descended from chimpanzees, monkeys, and gorillas. This is false. Humans are not directly descended from apes. Humans, monkeys, chimpanzees, and gorillas are descended from a common primate ancestor, which lived millions of years ago. This ancestor is now extinct. Our more recent ancestors have evolved from this common ancestor. In evolutionary terms, these apes are like cousins to humans (â€Å"Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial† 10). Human ancestors separated from ape ancestors about thirty million years ago; human ancestors separated from chimpanzee ancestors about seven million years ago. There are five major evolutionary features between humans and chimpanzees. The first is that humans have an increased brain size. The second difference is that is that humans have shorter jaws than chimpanzees. Humans also have bipedal posture, which means they constantly walk on two legs. There is a major difference between the size of a male and female chimpanzee. However, there is not a major size difference between male and female humans. The fifth difference is the family structure of each species. Humans take care of their children for about twenty years. Also, humans tend to stay with their mate for most of their lives. On the other hand, chimpanzees usually stay with their mate until they reproduce. There was also a Brewer 5 change of culture when Homo sapiens evolved. The changes included scavenging-gathering hunting style, agriculture, and machinery. The theory of evolution states that humans evolved over millions of years Evolution is support by scientific fact (Cambell 399). When people make the decision on which theory to support, they feel as if they must choose between their religion and science. Because it is part of the Christian, Muslim, and Jewish faiths to believe that God directly created the universe and everything included, it would be sacrilegious to support the theory that man evolved (â€Å"Creationism†). It is impossible to prove that God does not exist. Also, there is no current scientific evidence that proves creation never occurred (Morris). Evolution is the theory of science. It has been proposed by scientists and has been supported by scientific evidence (â€Å"Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial† 7). Without sufficient evidence, people are unable to state that evolution. On the other hand, scientists do not have enough evidence to state evolution is absolutely correct (Ake 398). Today some choose to accept evolution but still believe in religion. All that evolution states is that life on this planet could have arisen by natural processes. By definition science cannot address super natural causes, because it is confined to the natural worlds. Science is no longer considered to be antireligious (â€Å"Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial† 8). The issue about the origin of man has resulted in many argument and trials. Duane T. Gish wrote the book Evolution, The Fossils No! , which pushed the literalist line. The book was supposed to help creationism become accepted in science. This eventually brought to a course case in Arkansas in the 1970’s. Creationism was ruled to be non-scientific, because it did not fit the requirements. There are five essential characteristics for something to be scientific. It must be guided by natural law. It has to be explanatory by reference to natural law. It has to be Brewer 6 testable against the empirical worlds. Its conclusions are tentative. Finally, it must be falsifiable (â€Å"Creationism†). Some parents do not allow their children to learn about evolution in school. There are many arguments that explain why evolution should be taught in schools. The theory of evolution is thought of as one of the most well established fields of science. Students need to know about evolution, because it is the key to fully understanding the biological sciences (â€Å"Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial† 8). People also say that if schools teach evolution they must also teach creationism. The federal court has ruled that creationism cannot be taught in schools because it is not science. The federal court also said that creationism supports a specific religion (â€Å"Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial† 9). There have been several court trials on the issue. All laws banning the teaching of evolution were overruled. All laws mandating the teaching of evolution were also overruled â€Å"Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial† 13). The debate on the origin of man has lasted many years and does not appear to be ending soon. Because both evolution and creationism are theories, neither has been proven right or wrong (â€Å"Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial† 15). Creationism is the theory religion. Evolution is the theory of science. To make a decision on which is correct, people must chose religion or science. Brewer 7 Works Cited Ake, Benn, ed. â€Å"Evolution and Creationism. † Issues and Controversies. 3:19 09 Oct. 1998: 393-400. â€Å"Becoming Human. † NOVA. Corporation for Public Broadcasting, 03 Nov. 2009. Web. 18 Apr, 2011. Cambell, Neil, et al. Biology Concepts and Connections. San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings, 2003. Creation Versus Evolution. † Clarifying Christianity. Institute for Creation Research, 2001. Web. 18 Apr. 2011. â€Å"Creationism. † Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University, 29 Oct. 2007. Web. 15 Apr. 2011. â€Å"Evolution. † Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. 1996 Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial. Boston: NOVA,200 7. Morris, Henry. â€Å"The Bible is a Textbook of Science. † Bibliotheca Sacra Oct. 1964. Stencil Sandra. â€Å"Evolution vs. Creationism. † CQ Researcher. 7:32 22 Aug. 1997: 745-767. â€Å"What Darwin Never Knew. † NOVA. Corporation for Public Broadcasting, 29 Dec. 2009. Web. 15 Apr. 2011.

40 Fun Activities to Try with Your College Friends

40 Fun Activities to Try with Your College Friends The friendships you establish in college will be some of the most unique relationships you will ever have. Thrown together by chance or circumstance, these friendships usually last a lifetime. Not only that, but these relationships provide ample opportunities to stretch your wings, try new things, and live life a little irresponsibly. If you still have no friends in college, dont worry and find out how to find them! If it is not the case and you’ve been looking for suggestions on just how to spend time with your college friends, we have a few ideas for you. Start a water balloon fight on central campus. Get matching haircuts. Start a game of tag or hide-n-seek in Wal-Mart. Go for a swim in the school fountain. Schedule a Guitar Hero tournament. Plan a cornhole tournament. Girls, schedule a slumber party; boys, crash said party. Put on a lip-sync performance and create your own music video. Host a prom. Go on a road trip. Plan a progressive dinner. Get your fortunes told. Set up a faux senior portrait session; see if this attempt is less awkward than the last. Make an old school mixed CD and then swap the finished products. Have a classic TV marathon (Saved by the Bell for the girls, Dukes of Hazard for the boys). Clean out your closets and have a clothing swap. Plan a cook-off. Eat a picnic on the quad. Create the most absurd outfits imaginable and wear them to the gym for a workout. Ride the bus around town; you’re bound to discover local places you never knew about. Go to a drive-in movie. Host a costume party. Play Spin the Bottle. Throw a house warming party when someone gets new digs. Booby-trap someone’s dorm room. Attend the playoffs for one of your school’s sports. Saran wrap all the public toilets in the dorms. Plan a flash mob. Start a blog. Try an exotic food you can’t pronounce. Help someone else; put together a Relay for Life or Dance Marathon team. Learn about wine; there is more to know than just â€Å"red† or â€Å"white.† Go to a Pride Parade. Learn to drive a 5-speed car. Donate blood. Have a Nerf gun war. Play a milkshake drinking game. Paint pottery. Make a Burn Book, Mean Girls’ style. Have an eating contest. College doesn’t last long. Between all the studying and pointless part-time jobs, there isn’t much time left for fun. Make sure you use your time wisely! Grab your friends and do something reckless, spontaneous, or totally out of character today! We hope our list has inspired you to try something new. If you have more ideas about how to add some spice to the college life, share in comments!

Essay sample on #8220;The Socratic Method#8221;

Essay sample on #8220;The Socratic Method#8221; The Socratic method was developed by none other than Socrates- the godfather of western philosophy. The objective of it is to break down what we think, and to see reality with fresh eyes. It is done through a dialogue between people, where someone states something as true, and other individuals ask questions to critically assess whether the claim is correct. Socrates developed this method through his informal talks with a wide range of people. Eventually, through his questions, the individuals he talked to began to doubt their answers to fundamental inquiries, such as, â€Å"What is justice?† Thus, the Socratic method penetrates deep into thinking processes and exposes the flaws of our essential reasoning. In the following paragraphs, the method will be discussed in detail, from its development, process, and applications. Development Socrates (c. 470– 399 BC) believed that learning was not so much about gathering information, but more about keeping an open mind. His style of teaching was through dialogue, whereby the student would think he or she knows something, but was shown that his or her knowing was not exacting. Socrates started to teach through these dialogues after a friend of his, Chaerephon, had visited the Oracle of Delphis of his dialogues were recorded and expounded on his Plato’s works. Though Socrates may have come off as pretending not to know anything, through his wisdom and philosophical introspection, he understood that knowledge cannot be attained (Jarratt, Susan C.). Process It requires two people: one person with a claim, and one person who asks questions about the statement. It follows several steps:] The questioner allows the other person to encapsulate his or her claim. The questioner asks for evidence from the other person. The questioner challenges the assumptions of the individual making the claim. The questioner finds an exception in the idea of the person who made the original statement. The questioner asks the person to reform his or her original claim. The questioner goes through more inquiries and exceptions to show that the reforming of the original idea is not correct. Either the person who made the claim becomes exasperated or expresses doubt, or the questioner makes a conclusive statement about the false nature of the claims that have been made (wikiHow). Throughout this process, it is key that both sides do not become angry or frustrated- especially the questioner. The Socratic method is done with mutual respect, decency, and diplomacy. Applications The main application for the Socratic method is showing how concepts that are vague or lack concreteness can be exposed as false. These are often general principles we hold dear. It makes us reevaluate our foundations of thought and values. This method is also good for breaking down philosophical theories one has or other people have. It is a way to test theories of the intellect. Modern usage of the Socratic method can be found in not only philosophy but also in tutoring and teaching. Instead of telling students what to fix in their assignments, many teachers believe it is better to employ the Socratic method so that students arrive at the answers themselves. This process allows learners to resonate strongly with answers (â€Å"Socratic Method of Teaching: Pros and Cons†). The Socratic method was developed by one of the founders of western philosophy, Socrates. After hearing he was supposed to be the wisest person in Greece according to the Oracle, he tested out the claim by having dialogues with prominent thinkers of the time. He determined through his questions that his wisdom lay in knowing that he did not know anything, whereas other people thought they knew something. These dialogues formed the Socratic method, which was later adopted by Plato. This tool is not used to prove anything. Rather, it is for breaking down thoughts and concepts that are taken as facts or true, and showing that knowledge is essentially non-obtainable. Jarratt, Susan C. Rereading the Sophists: Classical Rhetoric Refigured. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1991., p 83. â€Å"Socratic Method of Teaching: Pros and Cons.† Portland, 15 Feb. 2018, education.cu-portland.edu/blog/classroom-resources/should-educators-use-the-socratic-method-of-teaching/. wikiHow. â€Å"How to Argue Using the Socratic Method.† WikiHow, WikiHow, 28 Mar. 2019, www.wikihow.com/Argue-Using-the-Socratic-Method.

The Confucian Business Ethics Equal importance to Profit, Process and Essay

The Confucian Business Ethics Equal importance to Profit, Process and Principles - Essay Example Li gives importance to etiquette and defined process in any business. Any simpleton will not buy a diamond from a beggar. Each business has its own set of etiquette to be followed without which it cannot prosper. A merchant dealing with diamonds should look and act refined manner matching his customer’s status to sell his products to them. Each of this quality is important to do business ethically and properly. Practical Difficulties in Implementing Ethics Several business gurus and universities teach the young executives only about gaining more profits and winning over others. They do not teach them about the ways to do it ethically. As a result the business industry has grown into a massive barbaric ground where each one tries to swallow the other. Taking ethical decisions in everyday life is neither easy nor practical. Even if one person inclines to act in an ethical way, the company principles and the other fellow workers cease to co-operate with them. It is near impossibl e for any business executive or a business as a whole to stay very ethical in their business process. How Confucianism Connects Business with Principles These arguments might sound quite convincing for any normal man. But, there are still a thousand ways any person can stay ethical, if they choose to follow the Confucian principles in day to day life. O.C. Ferrell lists a few practices which result out of declining ethical standards. They are 1. Misuse of company resources 2. Abusing the fellow employees 3. Stealing from the company by altering accounts 4. Producing defective products 5. Bribing the government officials to market them Half of these non-ethical practices are directly related to individuals and others as a... The researcher f this essay focuses on the analysis of the Confucian philosophy on business management, that is giving equal importance to profit, process and principles and is refered as the right way to manage modern day trade and commerce. The Chinese philosopher Confucius (551-479 B.C.) laid down clear rules on how to do business and live life generally. He believed business could be done in harmony with others without exploiting anyone, with collective interest in mind. The Confucian theory of business concentrates on four main principles, such as Ren – the quality of compassion towards fellow human beings, Xin – honesty and trustworthiness, Yi – giving importance to collective goodness more than personal profits and Li – following a etiquette and uniform process. Today, the western world views the business Confucianism only through the way the Chinese immigrants work. They interpret their sacrifices and hard work as hard and violent most of the time. The researcher mentiones that though most of the businesses in China struggle with the western influence, there are some like the example cited in this essay which have its strong ethical roots. It is such businesses that are transforming China into the next economical superpower, capable of lending millions of dollars to the US government. In conclusion, the researcher suggests that the Confucianism business ethics should be followed not only for the sake of ethics and profits, but to gain sheer peace of mind and happiness.

No war in the modern world can possibly be just. Discuss Essay

No war in the modern world can possibly be just. Discuss - Essay Example But humanists differ with such suppositions, stating that it is our moral obligation to use our reasoning mental faculties and intelligence to deliberate on war and overpower such natural instincts. Thus in the event of emergence of war, we ought to explore non-violent interventions (Norman, 2007, pp.1-5). Peaceful solutions are not often simple to arrive at or put into force, as the past record of the United Nations suggests. However, human beings should be committed in supporting the UN’s peaceful efforts towards resolving conflicts among states. A significant number of humanists, such as Betrand Russell, have come out to vehemently oppose the use and manufacture of weapons of mass destruction. Today’s religion is absurd since it is supportive of violent means of resolving differences and injustices (Norman, 2007, pp.1-5). Religion should never be a justification for participating in war. Non-religious individuals are quick to highlight the many wars that have been waged for centuries owing to religious differences. These are ridiculous reasons for taking away other people’s lives. They also condemn the role that world’s major religions play regularly in promoting war. Liberal democracies have a good overall reputation when it comes to violence. In fact, most liberal democracies will be remembered in the annals of history as having an excellent record for not igniting or promoting wars (Norman, 2007, pp.1-5). Today’s religions have deviated from seeking faith and purity, and instead become entangled in activities geared towards promoting war. In the past, Christians expressed reservations towards participating in military activities. Quite a negligible fraction of Christians today root for the commandment ‘Thou shalt not kill’. Equally, they cite Jesus’s advice to turn the other cheek and not and not resist evil, as a guideline for pacification. But when Christianity